You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Bojana Jovanovski’ tag.
Perhaps with an eye to the looming Olympics, many of the top women have “made themselves available” for Fed Cup duty as required for participation in the Summer Games. Rather than looking so far ahead, though, we discuss the eight ties in this weekend’s “Winter Games.”
Russia vs. Spain: A year ago, Sharapova followed a disappointing performance at the Australian Open with a Fed Cup defeat in Moscow. After reaching the Melbourne final this year, she will hope to carry that momentum into another home tie and an opening rubber against the 77th-ranked Soler Espinosa. While Sharapova generally has fizzled on Russian soil, the Spaniard has won just four WTA main-draw matches since the start of 2011. More problematic for the home squad is the second rubber between Kuznetsova and Suarez Navarro, who has defeated the Russian on hard courts and impressed in a three-set loss to Kvitova at the Australian Open. If the visitors can reach Sunday with a 1-1 tie, the pressure might accumulate on their heavily favored opponents. But Russia rallied from a 0-2 deficit in the same round last year, suggesting that they will respond courageously to adversity. Likely to win at least three of four singles rubbers, their far superior firepower should render the doubles rubber irrelevant.
Belgium vs. Serbia: The only top-20 player on either squad, Jankovic likely holds the keys to Serbia’s success but may find her fitness tested by the prospect of playing three rubbers. The former #1 has recorded notable exploits in team competition while compiling a 24-7 record in singles matches, and teammate Bojana Jovanovski has produced tennis much better than her current sub-100 ranking. Without Clijsters, Belgium rests its hopes on Yanina Wickmayer, who began 2010 and 2011 in impressive fashion before fading later in those seasons. Defeated by a qualifier in the Hobart final, she continues to struggle with consistency and may struggle with the unfamiliar role of spearheading this team. Like Jankovic, she probably will play three rubbers if necessary on a team with no other member in the top 150. Never have the two #1s met on an indoor hard court, a surface that should benefit the more aggressive Wickmayer. If the tie reaches the doubles, Jankovic’s superior grittiness should prevail.
Italy vs. Ukraine: Probably the least intriguing tie of the weekend is this pairing in which one team’s lowest-ranked player stands more than 50 notches higher than the other team’s highest-ranked player. A quarterfinalist at the Australian Open, Errani replaces the higher-ranked Pennetta, hampered by injury during January. Notable mostly for accomplishments on hard courts, Ukraine should count itself lucky to win any of the rubbers, for a daunting challenge awaits in the doubles against Australian Open doubles finalists Errani and Vinci. Although Schiavone fell early in her last two tournaments, a return to Italian soil should reinvigorate the 30-year-old veteran, especially when facing two women who have combined to win one main-draw match this year.
Germany vs. Czech Republic: In probably the most intriguing tie of the weekend, the 2011 champions open their title defense against the potent serving of Lisicki and Goerges. Solid but not spectacular in Melbourne, world #2 Kvitova delivered crucial victories for the Czech Republic in both the semifinal and final. Despite the victories that each German recorded against her in 2009 and 2010, the home team’s strongest hope may lie in preying upon her teammate Benesova and extending the tie to the doubles. Like Belgium, Germany enters the weekend without its leading singles player in Petkovic, so Lisicki and Goerges must curb their characteristic unpredictability and discipline themselves against playing to the level of the competition. Since both Germans and Benesova reached the second week of the Australian Open, one should expect an extremely high level of tennis in every singles rubber. Even if the tie reaches the doubles, though, the pairing of Hradecka and Zahlavova Strycova would summon greater experience and doubles expertise than any duo that the hosts could assemble. With a surface tailored to the strengths of both squads and a clash between two neighboring countries, this tie should produce not only explosive serves but the type of volatile atmosphere on which Fed Cup thrives.
World Group II:
USA vs. Belarus: No fewer than three #1s have traveled to the prosaic environs of Worcester, Massachusetts for the mere opportunity to contest the World Group next year. Those who wished to see Serena face one of the younger generation’s rising stars in Melbourne will find some consolation for January disappointment when she meets the newly top-ranked Azarenka on Sunday. Since the hosts possess the only doubles specialist on either team in Liezel Huber, the visitors would prefer to clinch the tie before that rubber. That objective would require Azarenka to defeat Serena and Belarussian #2 Govortsova to defeat promising American Christina McHale. Winless in three Fed Cup matches, McHale nevertheless has acquitted herself impressively on home soil with victories over Wozniacki, Bartoli, and Kuznetsova among others. Moreover, Azarenka may lack the willpower to overcome Serena if she suffers a predictable hangover from winning her first major title.
Japan vs. Slovenia: The only top-50 player on either team, Polona Hercog aims to lift Slovenia back into relevance during the post-Srebotnik era. Having just turned 21, she already has played sixteen Fed Cup rubbers and can wield significantly more offense than anyone on the Japanese squad. Two decades older than Hercog, Kimiko Date-Krumm has accomplished little of note over the past year, but she may draw confidence from her memories of a career-defining victory over Graf in this competition. Japanese #1 Ayumi Morita exited in the first round of the Australian Open and has lost her first match at eight of her last ten WTA tournaments. But the only two events in that span where she survived her opener happened on home soil. Update: Date-Krumm rallied from a one-set deficit to win the first rubber from Hercog, suggesting that one shouldn’t underestimate those memories–or home-court advantage.
Slovak Republic vs. France: During this weekend last year, an underpowered French squad thrust the Russian juggernaut to the brink of defeat in Moscow, so underestimate les bleues at your peril. That said, their collapse thereafter confirmed stereotypes of Nicolas Escude’s squad as mentally fragile, especially when situated in a winning position. Outgunned by the Slovakian duo of Hantuchova and Cibulkova, the visitors still face a challenge less daunting than Sharapova/Kuznetsova in 2011. Central to their initial success that weekend was a sturdy performance by Razzano, who has compiled a 7-3 singles record under her nation’s colors, and the location of the tie outside France, again a factor in their favor here. Nevertheless, the two leading Slovakians have edged through several tense ties together among their 71 combined Fed Cup rubbers, experience that infuses them with the sense of shared purpose and team spirit absent from their opponents.
Switzerland vs. Australia: On paper, this matchup looks as ludicrously lopsided as Italy vs. Ukraine. The lowest-ranked Australian, Casey Dellacqua, stands higher than Swiss #1 Stefanie Voegele. (How soon can Federer’s daughters start wielding a racket?) But Stosur has looked wretched while losing three of her first four 2012 matches, and Aussie #2 Gajdosova also exited Melbourne in the first round amidst a ghastly avalanche of errors. Both struggle under the weight of expectations thrust upon them by this proud tennis nation, especially the Slovakian-born Gajdosova. Adding depth to this potentially dysfunctional squad is Jelena Dokic, rarely free from controversy. If the Aussies simply focus on fundamentals and keep their wits about them, their overwhelming advantage in talent should propel them forward. Like the French, they may benefit from playing outside their nation, but somehow one senses that this weekend might unfold in a manner more interesting than expected.
[picapp align=”none” wrap=”false” link=”term=mahut+isner&iid=9193846″ src=”http://view.picapp.com/pictures.photo/image/9193846/france-nicolas-mahut-leans/france-nicolas-mahut-leans.jpg?size=500&imageId=9193846″ width=”500″ height=”340″ /]
Trudging to the locker room after a 16-14 fifth set against Santiago Giraldo, Thiemo De Bakker must have feared that this protracted encounter would leave him at a physical disadvantage against his next opponent, either Isner or Mahut. As all tennis fans know well, such thoughts proved unfounded as the Frenchman and the American shattered virtually every record in every single-match category. In fact, their seven-hour, 118-game final set-in-progress stretched so far beyond the boundaries of credulity that one expects its statistical superlatives to endure forever. Ten hours and 193 aces later, though, what difference does it really make? This first-round battle between two non-contenders stalled the first-week schedule and virtually eliminated both of its participants from sheer exhaustion. Once an advocate of the no-tiebreak format in Slam deciding sets, we feel compelled to reverse our opinion and call for a merciful ending to these inhumane endurance tests well before 50-50, as Kuznetsova whimsically suggested. Surely this fast-paced sport doesn’t deserve such a mind-numbing, kidney-challenging stalemate, which provided a gluttonous serving (haha) of generally monotonous tennis. In order to compensate for the difference between the best-of-five and best-of-three formats, perhaps the doubles super tiebreak (first to 10, win by two) could be implemented instead of the conventional first-to-7 structure. At least, Slams could employ such a deadlock-denying tactic in the first week before the marquee stars intersect. A marathon final set between Federer and Roddick in the championship match is a classic, but a marathon final set between Isner and Mahut in the first round is a human rain delay. Here are a handful of Day 4 matches to note while Wimbledon’s Believe It Or Not winds into its eleventh hour of futility.
Soderling (6) vs. Granollers (Court 1, 2nd match): At the start of 2010, the unremarkable Spaniard rallied from a two-set deficit to stun the Swede in his Australian Open first round. Soderling had swept their three previous meetings, including a four-setter on these same British lawns in the same round a year ago. Yet all of the sets were close on that occasion, indicating that this matchup bothers the two-time French Open finalist more than one might imagine considering Granollers’ pedestrian ranking. Far more powerful than his adversary, Soderling will need to banish memories of their collisions in an intriguing test of his mental willpower. During an opening win over Ginepri, he looked as formidable as any men’s contender and more formidable than most, but the Swede does remain vulnerable to the unexpected letdown. If the Spaniard can stay close early, a little drama might develop before the sixth seed moves on to more tranquil waters in the third round.
[picapp align=”none” wrap=”false” link=”term=tsonga+kendrick&iid=9180629″ src=”http://view.picapp.com/pictures.photo/image/9180629/france-wilfried-tsonga/france-wilfried-tsonga.jpg?size=500&imageId=9180629″ width=”500″ height=”329″ /]
Dolgopolov vs. Tsonga (10) (Court 2, 1st match): Unfocused and uncharacteristically irritable in his four-set opening win over the tricky Kendrick, the tenth seed alternated electrifying forehands and deft volleys with senseless misses and despairing moans. One of the highest-ranked unseeded players in the draw, the much-misspelled Dolgopolov (add a Jr. if you want) has steadily climbed up the rankings this season with victories over Tomic, Fish, Seppi, Clement, and Gonzalez; last week, he reached the Eastbourne semifinals and mustered a creditable performance against eventual champion Llodra. Boding well for his continued rise was his resolute demeanor when he encountered Nadal on clay, much sturdier than most developing stars facing an elite player for the first time. His game remains raw and a little undisciplined, rendering an upset in a best-of-five format unlikely. Nevertheless, Dolgopolov clearly has achieved an impressive comfort level on grass and brings much more surface experience to the contest than does Tsonga. If his self-belief doesn’t falter on a Wimbledon show court, this match could be highly competitive although probably not exquisite tennis.
[picapp align=”none” wrap=”false” link=”term=chakvetadze+wimbledon&iid=597337″ src=”http://view1.picapp.com/pictures.photo/image/597337/the-championships/the-championships.jpg?size=500&imageId=597337″ width=”500″ height=”334″ /]
Serena (1) vs. Chakvetadze (Court 2, 3rd match) : Watching the once-formidable Chakvetadze in her opener against Petkovic, we noticed that she is striking her groundstrokes with greater depth and conviction than she has during most of her extended swoon since early 2008. Not only creating clever angles with both forehand and backhand, she sensibly eschewed low-percentage shotmaking from behind the baseline and displayed further intelligence by occasionally wrong-footing the German. A fountain of double faults over the past two years, her serve remained steady even under pressure deep in the final set. Against Serena, of course, she’ll need to play at the very summit of her abilities just to stay competitive, and she’ll probably require some assistance from Serena. After a thunderous first set in her opener, the top seed dropped her game a few notches in the second set, allowing her overmatched opponent to stay within range. In this case, however, an overpowering first set probably would prove sufficient to crush the Russian’s ever-fragile confidence. Long a mental midget, Chakvetadze needs to seize the early momentum and hope for a sluggish start from the American. If this former prodigy starts promisingly, the match could be quite entertaining; if Serena establishes control immediately, it could get gruesome quickly.
Jovanovski vs. Azarenka (14) (Court 12, 2nd match): After the initial wave of Djokovic, Ivanovic, and Jankovic, the Serbs just keep climbing up the tennis hierarchy in numbers vastly disproportionate to their nation’s size. The latest Belgrade bombshell, the 18-year-old Jovanovski defeated Rybarikova, Molik, and Chakvetadze earlier in 2010 as she attempts to crack the top 100; in the first round, she ruthlessly eviscerated talented Australian lefty Casey Dellacqua. Despite suffering from a leg injury in the Eastbourne final, Azarenka has relished the shift from clay to grass as much as anyone and should be eager to exploit an extremely inviting quarter of the draw. While the Minx from Minsk endured a few puzzling losses during her last several events, she should decode the Serb’s game in plenty of time to advance. It’s always fascinating to watch an evolving player adjust to confronting top contenders at top tournaments, however, and the first week of a Slam is a great opportunity to assess what potential future stars might offer.
Vinci vs. Pavlyuchenkova (29) (Court 14, 2nd match): Like Soderling and Granollers, they met in the same place and the same round a year ago. On that occasion, the cunning Italian veteran prevailed over an inexperienced player nearly a decade younger than herself. A former junior #1 and junior Slam champion, the many-syllabled Russian avenged that defeat on the Brisbane hard courts this year, but injuries and erratic serving have led to several lopsided losses in recent months. Not endowed with an overwhelming delivery either, Vinci will seek to disrupt the rhythm of her baseline-bound foe with tantalizing slices that invite her to move forward out of her comfort zone. Can finesse and intelligent point construction prevail, or will Pavlyuchenkova’s groundstroke power deny the Italian time to create her artful combinations? At any rate, expect more breaks of serve and longer rallies than are typical on grass; this match should prove a refreshing antidote to the serve-a-licious marathon a few courts away.
[picapp align=”none” wrap=”false” link=”term=zheng+ivanovic&iid=910174″ src=”http://view.picapp.com/pictures.photo/image/910174/the-championships/the-championships.jpg?size=500&imageId=910174″ width=”500″ height=”338″ /]
Zheng (23) vs. Kvitova (Court 17, 1st match): A surprise semifinalist here in 2008, Zheng produced a third-round upset over top seed Ivanovic that not only signaled the Serb’s vertiginous collapse but also showcased the ability of compact, balanced counterpunches to overcome towering, slow-footed sluggers. The fearless Chinese star reprised that startling run with a second Slam semifinal appearance in Australia this year, after which she defeated Sharapova and threatened eventual finalist Wozniacki at Indian Wells. Among the curious paradoxes of grass is its capacity to reward both the very tall and the very small, the former of whom can crack unreturnable serves and the latter of whom can manipulate the surface’s low bounces. Against a mercurial Czech lefty, Zheng enjoys a substantial mental edge, but her high-risk style also can slip off the rails without warning. She must elevate her first-serve percentage in order shield her puny second delivery from Kvitova’s bold return; also, she should target her adversary’s loopy forehand, a long swing that easily can be mistimed on so fast a surface. If she takes chances at judicious moments, a delicious third-round collision with Azarenka beckons.
Briefly noted: On such a relatively uneventful day, we had to upgrade the matches that normally would populate this section to a more privileged status. Expect our usual coda to return for Day 5.
Meanwhile, the only women’s champion in the draw not named Williams returns on Day 4 with an outfit as immaculate as the lawns of the All England Club. Let’s hope that clay specialist Ioana Raluca Olaru doesn’t muddy Maria’s dress as did Gisela Dulko in the second round last year.
[picapp align=”none” wrap=”false” link=”term=sharapova+wimbledon&iid=9182706″ src=”http://view3.picapp.com/pictures.photo/image/9182706/the-championships/the-championships.jpg?size=500&imageId=9182706″ width=”396″ height=”594″ /]
The British monarch won’t be the only queen to appear at Wimbledon on Thursday.